New York Times Sues Microsoft And OpenAI For Impacting Its Business, Claims Generative AI Models Don’t Qualify For Fair Use

Share

Microsoft and OpenAI, and if the courts side with the New York Times, it could be a huge blow to all AI models. The lawsuit is a huge step in the right direction for content creators, but only time will tell if the New York Times can find a resolution to this issue. The New York Times has taken a bold step in initiating a lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI, two of the biggest players in the AI industry.

– succesful online entrepreneurs, nor by succesfull AI-powered entrepreneurs, AI-powered startups or AI-powered banks;
etc etc.
– founders of new skill-based online learning platforms;
– people that want to survive the online shakeout that is going on online since 2011 and which is accelerating since the launch of ChatGPT, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022.

The lawsuit is centered around the use of copyrighted material by Microsoft and OpenAI’s AI models, which scrape the internet for content and often paraphrase or directly quote sources without compensation. This lawsuit is a major step forward for content creators, as it could set a precedent for fair use of copyrighted material by AI. If the courts side with the New York Times, it could be a huge blow to all AI models.

The New York Times is asking for court assistance in forcing Microsoft and OpenAI to remove the New York Times’ copyrighted material from the AI models datasets. The lawsuit also asks for an injunction to prevent further use of the copyrighted material, as well as for restitution, disgorgement, and other damages. The question of whether AI models fall into fair use is already being investigated by government regulators, but the New York Times has taken the issue to the courts. This could be a major victory for content creators, and the outcome of this lawsuit could define the future of AI in the world.

More: Generative AI, The Future Of Work & Hire Tony As AI-Speaker @Speakersacademy

The New York Times has taken a stance against Microsoft and OpenAI with a lawsuit that focuses on the use of copyrighted material by AI models. Microsoft and OpenAI’s AI models scrape the internet for content and often paraphrase or directly quote sources without compensation. This lawsuit is a major step forward for content creators, as it could set a precedent for fair use of copyrighted material by AI. If the courts side with the New York Times, it could be a huge blow to all AI models.

The New York Times is asking for court assistance in forcing Microsoft and OpenAI to remove the New York Times’ copyrighted material from the AI models datasets. They are also asking for an injunction to prevent further use of the copyrighted material, as well as for restitution, disgorgement, and other damages. This could be a major victory for content creators, and the outcome of this lawsuit could define the future of AI in the world.

The issue of fair use by AI models is already being investigated by government regulators, but the New York Times has taken the issue to the courts. This could be a major milestone in the fight for copyright protections and fair compensation for content creators. The lawsuit has the potential to make it all the way to the Supreme Court and set the standard for AI use in the future. It remains to be seen how the courts will rule, but the New York Times’ decision to take a stand against Microsoft and OpenAI could have a huge impact on the AI industry.

More news: Google AI News, OpenAI News & Microsoft AI News.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You cannot copy content of this page